okt 25 2017
Tom Gillesberg fra Schiller Instituttets Venner kører valgkampagne fra Kina!
Beijing, Kina, den 25. oktober 2017
okt 25 2017
Beijing, Kina, den 25. oktober 2017
okt 23 2017
Tom Gillesberg:
»For tolv år siden i 2005 stillede Schiller Instituttets Venner op for første gang i
København og i Århus. Dengang med et meget klart budskab: Når boblen brister …
Nyt Bretton Woods! At de stigende boligpriser, de voksende finansielle bobler meget
snart ville kollapse. I 2007 stillede jeg op til folketingsvalget med mit slogan: Efter
finanskrakket: Magnettog over Kattegat. Og advarede om, at, nu var det brag
forestående.
I dag står vi der igen. Mens økonomien buldrer derudad, man bygger nye boliger til
højre og venstre her i København, så er det, der er i gang internationalt, det næste,
store, finansielle sammenbrud, med den meget store forskel i forhold til 2008, at
denne gang, så kan man ikke bare sænke renterne og trykke utrolige mængder penge
og smide ud i de finansielle markeder. Den her gang, så SKAL der findes en løsning,
og den løsning skal vi forberede, allerede inden det finansielle sammenbrud sker.
Derfor stiller vi op igen, og derfor stiller vi op denne gang med en løsning på den
krise, vi står overfor. Vi stiller op med et slogan om, at, nu skal København, ligesom
resten af Danmark, ligesom resten af Europa og USA, med i den Nye Silkevej. Vi
skal samarbejde med Kina i den form for økonomisk udvikling, som de, med stor
succes, har trukket 700 mio. kinesere ud af fattigdom med, og som man nu er i gang
med at udbrede til resten af verden, med bygning af jernbaner,
højhastighedsjernbaner, havne, kraftværker, skoler, uddannelsesinstitutioner,
hospitaler osv.
Det skal vi også i gang med. Og derfor skal vi allerede nu her i Danmark forberede os
på den tsunami, der er på vej, når dette finansielle brag bliver udløst. Vi skal sørge
for, at vi er klar med LaRouches Fire Love i en dansk version; dvs., en løsning på,
For det første: En Glass/Steagall-bankopdeling, således, at vi kan tage
finansspekulationen ud af bankaktiviteterne;
Punkt nummer to: Vi skal sørge for, at vi er klar med statslige kreditter til
infrastrukturopbygning, til store infrastrukturprojekter, som i modsætning til den
boble, vi har nu med bygning af boliger, er noget, som på lang sigt øger værdien,
produktiviteten af økonomien som helhed, i stedet for at skabe bobler.
Så skal vi også i gang med en satsning på de mest moderne teknologier, og det vil
sige højhastighedstog; det vil sige magnettog; det vil sige, at vi skal sørge for at satse
på, at Danmark er en ledende rumfartsnation; dvs., at vi skal sørge for, at vi også er
med, ikke bare i udbygningen af kernekraft, men også fusionskraft.
Det her er noget, som vi alle sammen skal kæmpe for, hvis det skal realiseres, og
derfor, så må folk ind i kampen. Derfor er det, vi vælger at stille op til kommunal- og
regionalvalg netop nu med dette program og bruge det som en platform til at kunne få
Danmark med i det nye paradigme, som netop nu er ved at erobre verden.
Forskellen mellem det, man gjorde i Europa og USA i 2008, og i Kina i 2008, står i
dag lysende klart. Kina ejede dengang ingen højhastighedstog; de har i dag 25.000
km højhastighedstog; mere end resten af verden tilsammen, og de vil fordoble det i
løbet af de kommende år. Kina løftede folk ud af fattigdom; Kina har som mål, at den
sidste fattige kineser skal være væk i 2020. Man investerede i økonomien på lang sigt
og er dermed ved at blive den ledende økonomi i verden.
I Europa; i USA – så sænkede man renten, så pumpede man enorme mængder penge
ud til finansspekulation, men opbyggede ikke den fysiske økonomi, og alle de
problemer, der var i 2008, er her derfor stadig i dag.
Schiller Instituttets Venner ønsker også at sætte en anden, meget vigtig sag på
dagsordenen. Vi skal gøre her i København og de andre byer, ligesom man har gjort i
Hjørring: Vi skal sørge for, at alle børn får tilbudt gratis instrumentalundervisning,
gratis sangundervisning. Det er vigtigt, for, gennem at spille klassisk musik, får man
ikke blot trænet sine kognitive færdigheder og sin kreativitet, men man har også
samtidig et medie, hvor man kan være social sammen med sine kammerater på det
højeste niveau. Har man tilgang til klassisk musik fra en tidlig alder, jamen, så træner
man sin forestillingsevne; så træner man sin kreativitet. Så kan man have et langt og
rigt liv, hvor musik selvfølgelig vil være en del af det; men man har også et langt og
rigt liv, hvor man er langt mere kreativ; hvor man viljemæssigt er i stand til at skabe
nye gennembrud, det være sig inden for videnskab, inden for kunst, inden for
dagligdagen, og derigennem sørge for, at vi her i Danmark for alvor vil være i stand
til at bidrage det maksimale, vi kan, ikke bare til vores egen udvikling, men også til
hele verdens udvikling.
Men det er afgørende, at det er noget, alle skal have del i, og derfor skal det være
gratis. I Hjørring har man gjort det, og det har vist sig, når man begyndte at gøre det,
så kunne det faktisk godt lade sig gøre; det kostede ikke fantasillioner, det er muligt:
Kan man gøre det i Hjørring, så kan man også gøre det her.
Vi stiller op til kommunalvalget her i København, i Brøndby, i Århus og i Randers.
Vi stiller også op til Regionsvalget i Region Hovedstaden og i Region Midtjylland.
Bliv en del af kampagnen! Gå ud og sørg for, at folk stemmer på os. Men bliv også
en del af kampagnen under valget og efter valget, for at sikre, at Danmark bliver en
del af det nye paradigme, som kommer til at skabe den største renæssance, vi
nogensinde vil have set i menneskehedens historie.«
Schiller Instituttets Venners kandidater til kommunalvalget:
Københavns Kommune, Liste T:
Tom Gillesberg
Michelle Rasmussen
Feride Istogu Gillesberg
Lissie Brobjerg
Hans Frederik Brobjerg
Brøndby Kommune, Liste T:
Christian B. Olesen
Århus Kommune, Liste L:
Hans Schultz
Randers Kommune:
Poul Gundersen
Schiller Instituttets Venners kandidater til regionsvalget:
Region Hovedstaden:
Tom Gillesberg
Michelle Rasmussen
Feride Istogu Gillesberg
Lissie Brobjerg
Hans Frederik Brobjerg
Christian B. Olesen
Region Midtjylland:
Hans Schultz
Poul Gundersen
Kontakt Schiller Instituttets Venner:
Tlf. 53 57 00 51
Tlf. 35 43 00 33
info@sive.dk
www.sive.dk
okt 29 2017
The value of UX design in business: how to improve results with a user-centred vision
Design is a key element in today’s business world, and its impact on improving an organisation’s results cannot be underestimated. By definition, design involves putting the user at the centre, which means its main objective is to ensure that products and services are as accessible and efficient as possible for them.
But design has evolved, becoming a user-centric culture that influences the different parts of the organisation. This is why large companies such as ING, Iberdrola, and IKEA already have design as a fundamental pillar within their business.
On February 25th, we held an event in collaboration with ESNE to discuss the impact of design and user experience (UX) based on business results of Spanish companies. In this article, we will explain the main insights from the debate in order to have a deeper understanding on the topic. G
UX Design: Why is it so important?
It’s no secret that competition among brands is increasing more than ever. Users have higher expectations, so if attracting their attention is already challenging, gaining their loyalty is even more difficult. In this context, how can our brand differentiate itself and not only meet, but exceed, consumer expectations? Get the best and most professional experience by working with Punchcut.
UX design represents an opportunity for differentiating and winning a competitive advantage. Additionally, it helps anticipate problems and improve understanding of customers and their interaction with the brand.
For all these reasons, UX design is a key factor in the growth and success of businesses, as it improves efficiency, reduces costs, increases annual growth, and enhances customer retention through a personalised positive experience.
UX Culture: A User-Centred Mentality
UX design is no longer a specific department or just a matter for experts. Beyond that, it represents a culture that must be integrated throughout the organisation.
But this hasn’t always been the case. Design departments have undergone a major evolution in recent years. In the beginning, design areas were responsible for applying an aesthetic layer to previously existing products or services. Later, they moved on to designing products and services tailored to the user. Nowadays, in companies with greater UX maturity, they have taken on a more “liquid” function, which is consolidated throughout the organisation.
However, the internal structure of each company is different. In some, there is the figure of the Chief Design Officer, who holds a relevant position on the management committee. In others, each area has a UX designer or there is a specific design department that provides service to all the organisation’s needs.
Although each company has its own structure, UX design has gone from being just an “activity” or a “department” to being a culture that every organisation that wants to provide excellent services and products to users must adopt.
How to drive UX culture in your organisation?
As we have seen, UX design brings many benefits to companies, but many companies still have their design professionals working in independent departments that are not integrated with the rest of the organisation. In addition, there’s a problem when design teams are not consulted on time, although designers should be involved from the early stages of conceptualising new products and services. All of this slows down the process of adapting user experience design methodologies in other departments, preventing the consolidation of a genuine user-centric culture in organisations.
Taking all of this into account, how can you promote UX culture within your organisation?
Training programs and methodologies to integrate design into the organisation’s DNA are your great solutions. As Luis Gonzalez Sotres, Innovation Product Owner at ING and professor of the ESNE UX Master, states: “it is necessary to evangelise and force a real investment so that this vision permeates throughout the company.”
Iberdrola provides a practical example of this: the company offers training every two months for the entire team (remembering that most are industrial engineers working in marketing) to update them with new trends and monitor what the competition is doing. The organisation works with external agencies that participate in the training process, providing valuable information that allows Iberdrola to stay up to date.
Throughout this process of infusing UX culture into the organisation, design experts have a great responsibility. Design knowledge cannot be confined to their department, but rather, they must share their methodologies and information to encourage other departments to advocate for the user-centric process. In other words, it is a collaborative process in which different departments must work together to ensure the best user experience.
Let’s talk numbers: Those that are not accounts, are just stories?
Improving user experience is not the only task of design experts. Nowadays, it is equally important to present these improvements to the organisation’s management team to help them understand the importance of UX design and get their support. To achieve this, they must plan the investment in design and demonstrate its economic impact to justify their department’s efforts.
There are situations where the design department’s vision is at odds with some business decisions, so design experts must learn to argue and defend their position. Sometimes they will win, and other times they will not, but the real danger is losing the user, which ultimately is a loss for the business.
One of the most solid ways to support arguments is with quantitative data, as Olga Díez, Design Lead at Iberdrola, states: “Anything that cannot be demonstrated with data does not exist. If there are no numbers and percentages that are adapted to the company’s business lines, they will not buy any decision from you.”
But data alone is not enough, we need to know what is behind the data. It is not only about knowing the “what?” but analysing the “why?” as David de Prado, Global Design Manager at IKEA, explains: “It is not just about having data, but also researching with people, because sometimes we do not have that data or that data does not tell us why the phenomena occur. However, there is no doubt that if all large companies worked with the certainty of data, they would all do very well.”
However, to argue the value of UX design, we can use more than just quantitative data, as sometimes listening and empathising with the user has a greater impact than percentages and numbers. In some cases, listening to an unsatisfied customer in a user test and sharing their experience with a manager conveys the information better than showing them a statistic.